ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH


1/15/01 12:24:05 PM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:

>These are seperate and distinct consensus's.  Let us not sidetrack the first one and mose forward seperately on the second.

Why not?  The questions in the first survey "consensus" did not include the question of whether the constituency system was acceptable to begin with.  
It was just assumed, out of hand and de facto.  The second poll shows that this was a mistake.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
           Hermes Network, Inc.


>Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>> 1/15/01 10:05:12 AM, Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for us
>> >to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
>>
>> Actually Greg, I'd say that there was more widespread support for the dissolution of the constitency structure.  In fact it appears to be a majority, check 
it
>> out: http://pollcat.com/Lite/report.asp?report=report/tzk27voon5_a
>>
>> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>