RE: [wg-review] 11. IDNH

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Sotiris,
The second poll seems to me to show that (more or less) the same people who
would vote to abolish the DNSO constituencies given the choice, would
equally vote to have one for individuals if the other objective were not
possible. I believe even Karl has supports this position. Would you really
want to block any representation whatsoever for individuals until the
objective of dismantling the DNSO had been achieved, even if that were to
take more than 2 years (giving time for the 'Large study had been completed
etc.)?

Suggestion:- If we were to replace the word "added" with "formed" in the
Chris McElroy/ David Farrar Motion, would this remove your doubts? Then
there would be no possible implied endorsement of existing failings of DNSO
Constituency Structure, while still allowing the idea of a constituency, any
constituency to go forward, with or without DNSO, with or without NC.  We
can leave that part to further WG-Review to work out the form etc. as per
the rest of the motion. If not, what is your suggestion?

Joanna

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Sotiropoulos
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Eric Dierker
Cc: Greg Burton; wg Review list
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 11. IDNH


1/15/01 12:24:05 PM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:

>These are seperate and distinct consensus's.  Let us not sidetrack the
first one and mose forward seperately on the second.

Why not?  The questions in the first survey "consensus" did not include the
question of whether the constituency system was acceptable to begin with.
It was just assumed, out of hand and de facto.  The second poll shows that
this was a mistake.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
           Hermes Network, Inc.


>Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>> 1/15/01 10:05:12 AM, Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com> wrote:
>>
>> >It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for
us
>> >to recommend a constituency of some kind here.
>>
>> Actually Greg, I'd say that there was more widespread support for the
dissolution of the constitency structure.  In fact it appears to be a
majority, check
it
>> out: http://pollcat.com/Lite/report.asp?report=report/tzk27voon5_a
>>
>> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>>
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html