RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 17:08 15/01/01 -0500, Sotiropoulos said:
>I call for a poll to ascertain the WG's MAJORITY position in agreeing what
clearly constitutes "consensus" BEFORE THIS WG SUBMITS ANY REPORT 
>WITH THE GROUP'S "STAMPED CONSENT"  ON A CONSENSUS BUILDING PROCESS (I am
not yelling)
>

Dear Sotiris,

We had a poll on 
[Q] Should our report to the NC focus on consensus or not?

Total number of voters: 33

-calling a vote result just that  25   votes   75.7576%
-try for reporting consensus  8   votes      24.2424%

In other words, a 3/4th majority wants the report to focus on voting
results, not consensus.

We also had a Poll on what the majority of  WG thinks that could be called
consensus. The majority opinion there was: 2/3 of the vote.

These two Polling results are incorporated in YJ' s report.

Isn't that enough?
 

--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html