RE: DNSGA Re: [wg-review] [Review] ccTLD vs DNSO vs ICANN vs GAC

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Derek Conant wrote:-
Domain Name System General Assembly (DNSGA)
http://www.dnsga.org

Maybe the international Internet community, and more specifically ccTLD
representatives, need to participate in a new organization wholly separate
from
ICANN?>

Hi Derek,
From what I can gather, you established DNSGA less than six months ago.
Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Since then, you say you have received "overwhelming support from
representatives of country-code top-level domain registries (ccTLDs) and
from the international Internet community." If so, clearly DNSO is not
delivering all that the ccTLDs want and I wonder what role the DNSGA is
fulfilling exactly that cannot be matched by ICANN.

Here are my questions:-

In relation to constituencies:-
1.) What would be the advantages for ccTLDs to leave DNSO and join an
organization independently of ICANN ?
2.) What kind of relations do you anticipate between DNSGA and ICANN?

In relation to procedure:-
3.) Do you anticipate difficulties with the multi-lingual aspects of a
growing international organization?
4.) How does the process by which you function and create policies etc.
differ from the DNSO/ ICANN?

Thank you,
Joanna Lane


Eric Dierker wrote:

> I bow to your wisdom and Greg's analysis of how we can accomplish the most
good.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joanna Lane wrote:
>
> > Eric wrote:-
> > Don't you think that perhaps our input may help them in the task.  The
> > extraordinary support from this group regarding addressing the issues of
> > multi-lingualism should at least let them know they have a wide base of
> > support
> > to come up with solutions.  Also it will give people a heads up as to
what
> > likely antagonists positioning will be, something I would be most
grateful
> > for.
> >
> > On the other hand I would like to know where in Mr. Burton's categories
this
> > thread belongs.
> >
> > [Joanna]  I just think we could save time if we knew what the ccTLD's
want
> > first, and in particular, from this WG.
> > Hello ccTLDs, do you have any position papers to clarify the issues for
us?
> >
> > > YJ Park wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello members,
> > > >
> > > > As you read, Bill asked not to cross post wg-review message to
> > > > cctld-discuss list. Please keep this in mind.
> > > >
> > > > We have focused "Language Divide" and "Translation Cost" in
> > > > ICANN process. As you may know, ccTLD is going to have a
> > > > meeting in Hawaii to figure out what their future should be.
> > > >
> > > > Since ccTLD constituency is in the DNSO structure at this juncture,
> > > > it might be more productive to discuss bigger picture for
WG-Review's
> > > > recommendation to the Names Council.
> > > >
> > > > 1. [DNSO Structure Discussion] ccTLD should be in the DNSO?
> > > > 2. If not, what could be the potential model
> > > > 3. [NET Sovereignty] If so, what kind of relations should there
> > > >     be between ccTLD and ICANN
> > > > 4. What kind of relations among ccTLD vs ICANN vs GAC
> > > >
> > >
> > > > :So with this in mind just what sort of relations exist at this
time?
> > >
> > > I am not comfortable with discussing what would be the appropriate
model
> > for
> > > ccTLDs, when they, themselves, have not yet determined what their
future
> > > should be. I would have thought we should wait for a proposal to come
from
> > > Hawaii, then discuss the merits.
> > > Joanna
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html