<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] [Fwd: no, thank you]
The problem I see here is that ccTLD representatives and their constituency
members believe that the DNSO or any other ICANN affiliated organization will
not act in the best interest of the international Internet community and ccTLDs
constituency concerns. I believe that ICANN has not acted in the best interest
of the international Internet community and ccTLDs and this has caused ccTLD
representatives to not trust the DNSO and ICANN process. Let's be real and
honest here. If you have participated in these processes, can you blame them?
I would like to believe that the DNSO and ICANN can do more for the
international Internet community and ccTLDs constituency concerns than just
give them a forum to voice there concerns.
I believe that existing forum processes have shown to have little impact on
ICANN final objectives.
Greg Burton wrote:
> At 09:11 PM 1/17/01, Derek Conant wrote:
> >Maybe the international Internet community, and more specifically ccTLD
> >representatives, need to participate in a new organization wholly separate
> >from
> >ICANN?
>
> That is certainly a position that some people hold, Derek. It is hardly
> relevant, however, to a conversation aimed at improving the process inside
> the DNSO. This working group welcomes constituency members, and their
> concerns. By it's nature it seeks to incorporate them into the process,
> rather than suggest they leave.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|