ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference


Dear Ken,

There appears that we have had some miscommunication here so far.

1st, regarding the agenda 8. I just mainly used Greg's, co-chair of
this group, suggested agenda distributed on Dec. 18 in this list.

From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 7:37 AM
Subject: [wg-review] [Agenda] Fitting language/translation in & schedule

1. Preliminary Report Discussion and Approval
2. Constituencies
3. General Assembly
4. Names Council
5. Work Groups
6. Standardized Procedures and Language/Translation Issues
7. Outreach
 add  8: Final Preparation, Vote and Report Approval

> i cannot agree with your selection of the time for the call. the time of
the
> day scheduled  does not appear to de designed AT ALL to encourage any
> participation from most of  Latin America, Europe & the USA.

2nd, regarding time proposal, I suggested as follows 9:00 eastern time
initially
and then Greg is supposed to handle this as co-chair. Finally he announced
4:00 GMT which I personally have no idea where it came from however,
I have respected his decision as co-chair of this group.

==================================
               WG-Review Teleconference
 ==================================
 Date: 2001. 1. 19. Friday. 9:00 AM. NY Time [Not confirmed]
 Participants: WG-Review Members

> i would also like to know who is paying for the call. Is it MINC ? and if
so
> as a member of Minc i would strongly protest this action and personally
feel
> that issues # 8 & 9 listed below do not belong on this agenda as they will
> easily get diluted in importance when "lumped" with the other DNSO review
> issues.

Yes, MINC board decided just this weekend upon my urgent request which
also feel sorry for and brought some level of cons and pros inside the
board.
Yes, your suggestion is noted and this will get proper highlight in the
right place.

>  I do not understand why the language/translation issue is being dealt
with
> in the context it is here.
>
> I am terribly concerned that this important language/translation issue
will
> get lost and give a second-level status in the context of all the other
> issues listed in the agenda.
>
> the language /translation issue is a problem which needs to be addressed
> totally separately as it exists throughout the entire ICANN structure
> (including all SO's) .

I  do agree. This is not one specific SO and it is cross-SOs.

Thanks,
YJ

> ken stubbs
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>
> To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Cc: <board@minc.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:27 AM
> Subject: [wg-review] [Teleconference] WG-Review Teleconference
>
>
> > Hello WG-Review members,
> >
> > Appreciating MINC board who has approved to support
> > DNSO WG-Review's teleconference upon the urgent request,
> > I also would like to thank Michael Gendron who initially
> > volunteered for the bridge and Greg who tried to sort out issues.
> >
> > I tentatively put 20 people for the teleconference,
> > so it will be of help to notify your participation in advance
> > not to avoid lack of ports just in case people cannot have
> > proper access due to its limited lines.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > YJ
> >
> > ================================
> > Date: 2001. 1. 23. Tuesday. 4:00 AM. GMT
> > ================================
> > Conference Tel : 65 - 668 - 7700
> > Conference code:  517595#
> > Duration: Two hours(with three hours reserved)
> > ================================
> > Conference Chairman: YJ Park
> > No of Participants, WG-Review Members: 20
> > ================================
> > Draft Agenda:
> >
> > 1. Agenda approval
> > 2. Schedule, Work Plans for Next Period
> > 3. Preliminary Report Discussion and Approval
> > 4. Constituencies
> > 5. General Assembly
> > 6. Names Council
> > 7. Work Groups
> > 8. Standardized Procedures and Language/Translation Issues
> > 9. Outreach
> > 10. Draft DNSO Review report, version 1.0
> > 11. AOB
> > ==================================
> > Time Difference
> > ==================================
> > 4:00   GMT
> > 24:00 New York Eastern Time
> > 21:00 California
> > 12:00 Korea, Japan
> > 13:00 Singapore
> >
> > Please visit to
> > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/ for confirmation.
> > ==================================
> >                         [End of Message]
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>