RE: [wg-review] Voters should indicate they voted!

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 02:20 PM 1/31/01, Cindy Merry wrote:
>Voted on what?  Which vote?  Where?  I must have missed the question
>although I swear I've read over 4000 e-mails!  Cindy

Good to see you're still here, Cindy. This entire topic is apparently about 
who voted in the poll about "should the constituency structure be 
abolished". Mr Conant, despite comments that the number of voters (25) was 
extremely small give the over 140 members of the WG and 43 members who had 
contributed to the constituency threads, seems bent upon insisting that 
there were too many voters. Mr Conant was apparently not present for the 
initial discussions about voting or constituencies.

Given Mr Conant's habit of recaptioning threads to include the name of his 
organization, and his demonstrated ability to make unsubstantiated and 
incorrect claims (including that he had been censored), I suspect that his 
real intent is to continue to promote himself inappropriately within this 
WG. That he has managed to divert attention to himself rather than to the 
subjects of the WG makes his strategy appear to be a success.

On a more pleasant topic, as I remember you had created a list of acronyms 
used in the discussions. If you still have that, could you forward it to 
Joanna Lane so that she might incorporate it on the web site she's doing 
for us (www.internetstakeholders.com).


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html