Re: [wg-review] reporting

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

Roeland Meyer wrote:

> Considering that this review is restricted to the DNSO, ICANN staffing isn't
> pertinent. DNSO staffing is and should probably be covered in the "funding"
> phase of this process.
>

I was more interested in how it works now.

Are you saying that the DNSO staffs itself independent of ICANN?  If the
problems for the DNSO are that lack of ICANN staffing to facilitate it's
purpose, isn't that pertinent?

OTH I can find out outside the work group and make my own determination that may
be more productive.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html