RE: [wg-review] Names Council 3

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
|>Behalf Of Eric Dierker
|>Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 6:05 PM
|>To: review
|>Subject: [wg-review] Names Council 3
|>
|>
|>This is perhaps one of the most important and yet out right 
|>silly topics of all we address.  <SNIP>

I have to say the current situation where Constituencies are able to place 3 members onto the NC as very bizarre.  Given that the NC is supposed to be the representative body that reports up the chain.  It would appear to me there is very little provision to ensure the positions on the NC are filled by the best qualified and capable people.  No does there appear to be a direct relationship between the positions and the number of participants they represent.

These are serious issues that need to be addressed.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html