RE: [wg-review] Names Council 3

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Maybe you have a point. However, none of the world leaders present their
resumes to the people they govern.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dassa [mailto:dassa@dhs.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:54 AM
> To: wg-review@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-review] Names Council 3
> 
> 
> 
> |>-----Original Message-----
> |>From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
> |>Behalf Of Eric Dierker
> |>Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 6:05 PM
> |>To: review
> |>Subject: [wg-review] Names Council 3
> |>
> |>
> |>This is perhaps one of the most important and yet out right 
> |>silly topics of all we address.  <SNIP>
> 
> I have to say the current situation where Constituencies are 
> able to place 3 members onto the NC as very bizarre.  Given 
> that the NC is supposed to be the representative body that 
> reports up the chain.  It would appear to me there is very 
> little provision to ensure the positions on the NC are filled 
> by the best qualified and capable people.  No does there 
> appear to be a direct relationship between the positions and 
> the number of participants they represent.
> 
> These are serious issues that need to be addressed.
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html