<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[wg-review] summary stuff
At 08:33 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>Is there some kind of unofficial, behind-the-scenes WG-Review ML going on?
No. Or at least not that I'm aware of - I wouldn't participate in one if
there was.
>Greg, as Chair, please tell us why this "suggestion" could not have been made
>publicly to all the Members of the WG by the initial author?
No particular reason that I know of - if the writer has one, I'm not aware
of it.
>Doesn't that make you an advocate?
No. I brought it to the list because several individuals - without prior
contact with each other, as far as I can tell - independently wrote me over
the last 10 days to express concern about the WG falling into "last man
standing" syndrome. Bringing something up for public discussion isn't advocacy.
This is my last response on this, so feel free to have the last word.
Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|