RE: [wg-review] [IDNH] my posting to the ICANN forum
Joop Teernstra wrote:- On how many of the participants in this WG, who have unselfishly contributed so much of their time, do you want to stick cheap labels? Kent, the comment that sparked this response does not merit repeating. This does, because it's right on target and IMO, you deserve it. Please remember that for every one of us here today, there are millions of others who will walk in our shoes tomorrow. You and your successors cannot browbeat them all. It should be our mission to make progress with mutual respect and understanding. I am not singling you out in that respect, but am surprised that you have apparently failed to notice the relationship between making comments that induce hard feelings and the incidence of disgruntled individuals. Joop Teernstra wrote:- Once the constituency is recognized, the disgruntled individuals who may not become gruntled <g> overnight, will be heavily diluted by an influx of new constituency members, who will finally have a clear and positive purpose to be there: to help build a better DNSO, a better Names Council and a better ICANN. True and it is not only the disgruntled individuals who will be heavily diluted, but also the antagonists who add fuel to the fire in an unhelpful way....<g> Joanna
--Joop-- Former bootstrap of the CA/idno The Polling Booth www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/ -- This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list. Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message). Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html |