Fw: [wg-review] ccTLD SO

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Hello ccTLD representatives,

This topic has been discussed on and off during Melbourne
ccTLD constituency meeting, WG-Review's efforts to evaluate
ccSO together with ccTLD representative will be meaningful.

Thank you,
YJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 9:23 AM
Subject: [wg-review] ccTLD SO


> As a starting point for structural discussions, I see the very real
> possibility that the ccTLD Constituency may decide to form their own
> Supporting Organization.  The creation of such an SO would thereby
preclude
> the existence of a ccTLD Constituency within the Names Council of the
DNSO:
>
> Section 4. ELIGIBILITY
> No person shall serve simultaneously as (i) a member of any Supporting
> Organization Council or other body that is directly responsible for the
> selection of Directors by that Supporting Organization and (ii) a Director
> or a member of any other Supporting Organization Council.
> http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-16jul00.htm#VI
>
> Perhaps a representative of the ccTLDs could comment on this possibility.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html