Re: [wg-review] ccTLD SO

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:23:13 -0500, you wrote:

>As a starting point for structural discussions, I see the very real
>possibility that the ccTLD Constituency may decide to form their own
>Supporting Organization.  The creation of such an SO would thereby preclude
>the existence of a ccTLD Constituency within the Names Council of the DNSO:
>
>Section 4. ELIGIBILITY
>No person shall serve simultaneously as (i) a member of any Supporting
>Organization Council or other body that is directly responsible for the
>selection of Directors by that Supporting Organization and (ii) a Director
>or a member of any other Supporting Organization Council.
>http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-16jul00.htm#VI
>
>Perhaps a representative of the ccTLDs could comment on this possibility.

If the ccTLDs do form a supporting organisation (which personally I
support) this would not mean they necessarily can not also be in the
DNSO as they do have a legitimate interest in gTLD policies

The above clause just means that whomever is elected to the ccTLD SO
Council could not also be on the DNSO Names Council.

DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html