ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] WG Review and the future review process


Jefsey,

Currently the discussion on the WGr List will
remain on the WGr, until such time as this List is
dissolved.  The www.internetstakeholders.com web
site is (at this juncture) to be viewed as a
supplemental and corollary rallying point for the
collation and editing of the ideas expressed with
the WGr.

Of course, we always have options, and come April
16th we will be in a better position to explore
alternatives to the WGr List, if it should prove
necessary to do so.

For the time being, I think the WGr would be
better served to concentrate on the issues at
hand.  

Sincerely,

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
	Working Chair, WG Review

Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> 
> Dear Chair,
> I motion in due time so we may organize ourselves, that
> "
> the WG-Review Mailing List is transfered to a permanent
> Center of Interest as described in my DNSO model. Its charter
> would be to accompany progressive practical changes in the
> DNSO organization through research, discussion, project
> catalysis etc...
> "
> 
> Comments:
> Joanna Lanes' site could be used. The only needs we would
> have would be a free ML (I think I have a stable and accepted
> solution without commercials) and a link on the DNSO site.
> Either the Secretariat would accept to copy us the list of the
> WG-Review Members or we could use the archives (I understand
> there are programs to do the job).
> 
> Jefsey
> 
> On 10:07 21/03/01, Philip Sheppard said:
> >Message to WG Review
> >
> >The work of WG Review has been greatly appreciated and the interest
> >expressed by Sotiris Sotiropoulos  to continue with the review process is
> >also good news.
> >
> >The execution of recommendations from the Review process is a part of the NC
> >business plan and an interim group has been formed to recommend terms of
> >reference and means of outreach for this.
> >
> >The work of the existing WG Review (whose terms of reference were to
> >contribute to the consulting phase of the review process) will come to a
> >close 16 April. At this date the list will close and subscribers will be
> >transferred to the GA Announce list as is usual practice. General discussion
> >will continue on the main GA list.
> >
> >In addition, individuals who are keen to do more will soon see a new
> >opportunity for this. Opportunities to contribute to issues relevant to the
> >NC as its exists today and a longer term restructuring will be separate.
> >
> >Philip Sheppard
> >NC Chair
> >
> >--
> >This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> >("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>