RE: [wg-review] WG Review and the future review process

["Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Jefsey Morfin wrote:
Comments:
Joanna Lanes' site could be used. The only needs we would
have would be a free ML (I think I have a stable and accepted
solution without commercials) and a link on the DNSO site.
Either the Secretariat would accept to copy us the list of the
WG-Review Members or we could use the archives (I understand
there are programs to do the job).

The software running internetstakeholders.com has a threaded forum as part
of the package. We decided to remove this while the ML is open to avoid
confusion. This can be reinstated if desirable and I don't see any reason
why WG-Review cannot keep going indefinitely on this basis.
Joanna




--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html