ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] [Fwd: NC input]


Milton Mueller wrote:
> 
> Sotiris:
> 
> After a quick review of these proposals let me say that I prefer the structure proposed by Jefsey Morfin. I should rather say that I support the concept - a lot of the details remain to be worked out.
> 
> I like the concept of a much looser structure where interest groups can assemble and disassemble and there is no fixed number or set of constituencies.
> 
> Details:
> * What defines "membership" in the GA?
> * How many people are on the NC?
> * Who pays for DNSO activities?
> * Carefully define the relationship (policy making authority) between the GA and the BoD. the word "consultant" is vague and not useful.
> 
> The latter point is critical. ICANN assigns economically valuable property rights. Registries invest $$$ and need to recoup these investments via the market. Registries and registrars need to know what the rules are and who can change them.
> 
> Please forward to the wg-review list if necessary.
> 
> --Milton Mueller
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>