<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] Representative Figures
Dassa wrote:
[In his response to Kent Crispin]
> Actually it is, to put it plainly, crap.
There's really no need for this sort of thing on
the list Darryl, please refrain from tainting your
otherwise interesting comments with such verbiage.
>I am in a company which has over
> 160,000 users on the Internet, my being a member of any constituency or group
> does not automatically mean those users are represented.
>
> Nor are all of the members of various other organisations represented.
Good point. In fact, many of the actual full
Members of the BIZ Constituency are also members
of most of the Associations also listed as Members
on the BC web site. It seems that these
Corprations would agree with your statements, and
have chosen to "double up" their voices by
ensuring a representation of their own in the BC.
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
Working Chair, WG Review
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|