Re: [ga] "to represent the unrepresented"

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Joop,

Registrants and Users;

How can I deny that many people who are dotcommoners share your wonderful
position?  It is true that many almost lay users have a registration.  They are
completely behind you and your goals. It is a truth that there is not much to
distinguish the goals of a single domain name holder (registrant) and a simple
user.  But there is also truth that there is a large divide.  Let us work together
to come to a common goal and conclusion of a proper ICANN that is truly
representative of the people.

It is time to have your constituency.

Eric

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 07:42 9/08/01 +1200, DPF wrote:
>
> >*If* such approval in principle is given with perhaps a deadline for a
> >detailed proposal then a detailed proposal you shall have.  Myself and
> >many others will spend dozens of hours on coming up with a superb
> >proposal.
>
> Bravo!
> This new proposal will have the benefit of having many elements that have
> been debated and critiqued already by many parties, old and new to the effort.
>
> >However what motivation is there to do so when previous
> >attempts have all ended in nought.
>
> Unflattering things have been said about such motivation.
> I would also prefer to see the rational motivation of people who are
> committed to work towards a clear and attainable goal.
>
> --Joop--
> the Cyberspace Association.
> (www.idno.org)
> The Polling Booth
> www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html