ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] We can't be against it?


Dear DPF,
you should know better: it is an ICANN Community consensus. ICANN Community 
consensa permit to forget about such outdated details as consultations, 
debates, votes, bylaws, rules, SO, Councils, GA.

Some say they come from the "Single Internet Management Source".

On 10:03 28/09/01, DPF said:
>On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:16:10 +0200 (CEST), Marc Schneiders
><marc@venster.nl> wrote:
>
> >Yesterday ICANN announced (see www.icann.org) that the next meeting
> >in MdR (LA) will be different and mainly devoted to security issues
> >following the September 11 tragedies. Other topics on the agenda will
> >probably be postponed.
>
>What I would be very interested to know is who actually made this
>decision?  Was it a staff member?  Was it the Executive Cmte or was it
>the Full Board?  Were any SOs consulted?
>
>DPF
>--
>david@farrar.com
>ICQ 29964527
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>