DNSO Archives: [ga-full]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] We can't be against it?

To: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
Subject: Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
From: DPF <david@farrar.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:03:38 +1200
Cc: ga@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109272306410.97706-100000@pan.bijt.net>
Organization: Doing Well
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109272306410.97706-100000@pan.bijt.net>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:16:10 +0200 (CEST), Marc Schneiders
<marc@venster.nl> wrote:

>Yesterday ICANN announced (see www.icann.org) that the next meeting
>in MdR (LA) will be different and mainly devoted to security issues
>following the September 11 tragedies. Other topics on the agenda will
>probably be postponed. 

What I would be very interested to know is who actually made this
decision?  Was it a staff member?  Was it the Executive Cmte or was it
the Full Board?  Were any SOs consulted?

DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>

References:
- [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.NL>
- [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.NL>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>