ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] We can't be against it?


On 01:32 02/10/01, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. said:
>From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
> > hmm, so some don't consider business registrants/others
> > a constituency?  We think we are represented by one of the ICANN DNSO
> > constituencies. And the non commercial registrants are engaged through the
> > N-C Constituency.
>
>Well, let's see.  I saw the "participate in ICANN" web page, so I'd like to
>participate.  Now, I have a domain name, and I sometimes use my email address
>to conduct business, so that leaves me out of the N-C Constituency.  So I
>guess that means I can join the Business Constituency as an individual who
>has a domain name and conducts business every now and then, right?
>
>Hmmm... somehow I don't seem to fit those qualifications either.  Who is it
>that represents me?

You fit into the DNSO/BC/SME ... with the problems we all know for now :-)
Now, you understand why some oppose the IDNHC and the SMEC.
Jefsey


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>