Re: [ga] IDNO -- This affects you.

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all IDNO'ers,

Eric Dierker wrote:

> After rereading this for the umpteenth time it hit me that this was
> exactly correct.

  In essence yes it is!  ICANN should stick to the technical knitting.
Policy issues are obviously not it's forte.  But it is way too late for
that
now, unfortunately.  The political dogs of war are afoot.

>
>
> If we removed the DN issues from ICANN and set them up in a different
> Organization for just that purpose and signed a contract with DoC for
> just that purpose.  Then everyone would be in a better position to
> accomplish matters.  Perhaps it is not possible to have the same plant
> produce sardines and autos simultaneously.

  Well Sardines are not produced.  However, your point here anyway
is well taken.  Has been for some time now...

>
>
> You know it never even occurred to Postel that the names would be so
> huge.  In fact the phenom is only about three years old.

  Yes Postel know in 1991 that this was going to be huge issue
at some point.  In addition this 'Phenom' as you put it has
been around for about 5+ years, not 3.  One has only to go
back to the creation for RFC 1591 and review the IAHC
and gTLD-MoU process to understand that clearly.

>
>
> Food for thought, and please do not eat the waiter.
>
> "William S. Lovell" wrote:
>
> > Skipping past the personality issues, I think a bit of history will
> > help
> > explain the dilemma in which those who want an individual domain
> > name holders constituency faces, and this background comes from
> > some material posted by Amadeu Abril i Abril in the context of the
> > recent election. He pointed out that ICANN was to be a technical
> > body, and the original SOs were defined in terms of their technical
> > function. The purpose was to set up, operate, and maintain a
> > properly functioning internet system, including a domain name
> > system, and that was all.  Consequently, no thought was given to
> > any representation by users, domain name holders, or the like,
> > since they had no technical role to perform, but only to make use
> > of whatever ICANN created.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html