[ga] Re: [ga-abuse] Personal attack, by Mr Walsh, again

[k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)]

Joop & All,

Although Mr. Walsh is on the list of folks whom our secretariat will impose 
sanctions on, it is their decision to not suspend Kent Crispin as requested 
by the List Monitor Committee this past August that created the situation 
we are dealing with today.  Since the DNSO will not suspend Kent Crispin 
under any circumstances, it is not fair or reasonable to process complaints 
against other members.

This applies to all complaints received since August.  We really thought 
the DNSO had simply overlooked this; but over time we have learned that 
more that just the LMC has access to our private list.  For example, I am 
sure Mr. Walsh was aware of your complaint Joop not too long after you sent 
it to ga-abuse.

Before I joined the DNSO my opinion of it was that it was a sham.  After 
working as a list monitor for the GA, I know it is a sham.

~k

At 01:41 AM 10/26/2001 +1300, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:49:36 -0700
>From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d)
>Reply-To: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
>Message-ID: <2820883865.20011025034936@userfriendly.com>
>To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
>CC: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>, ga@dnso.org
>Subject: Re[3]: [ga] Songbird in the BC?
>In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20011025204513.02dc52d0@pop3.voyager.co.nz>
>References: <20011024221808.C22951@songbird.com> <c6.a24826.2908c62e@cs.com>
>  <20011024221808.C22951@songbird.com>
>  <5.0.2.1.2.20011025204513.02dc52d0@pop3.voyager.co.nz>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
>Precedence: bulk
>X-UIDL: 122093aea74f0e4f6656ec4e37e89965
>
>Thursday, Thursday, October 25, 2001, 12:52:09 AM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
>
> >>  They
> >>represent the single largest channel for the origination of domain
> >>name registrations, which they handle on behalf of their user base,
> >>and thus have a direct and compelling interest and stake in the DNS
> >>process.
>
> > That should get these people out of the Individual Registrants'
> > constituency where they do not really belong and which they may try to
> > subvert for their own interests.
>
>Your paranoid fantasy of capture doesn't hold out in the facts, Joop.
>
>Much like your recent allegation that I am in cahoots with Louis
>Touton to ruin you.
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
>Userfriendly.com Domains
>The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
>***********
>Must I reply to this on the list?

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html