Re[2]: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 1:56:36 PM, Peter Dengate Thrush wrote:

> That is why, incidentally, the DNSO needs to remain as it is, as the
> debating chamber for the development of consensus policies affecting the
> g-TLDs,

That is not what it is, nor is it what it should be or become.

There is no special status for the ccTLDs that warrant them having
their own SO.  None.

The ccTLD CONSTITUENCY bears the brunt of the responsibility for
non-addressing of ccTLD issues in the DNSO.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html