ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: Re[2]: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA


|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@wxsoft.info]
|> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:12 PM
|> 
|> Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 1:56:36 PM, Peter 
|> Dengate Thrush wrote:
|> 
|> > That is why, incidentally, the DNSO needs to remain as it 
|> is, as the
|> > debating chamber for the development of consensus policies 
|> affecting the
|> > g-TLDs,
|> 
|> That is not what it is, nor is it what it should be or become.
|> 
|> There is no special status for the ccTLDs that warrant them having
|> their own SO.  None.

That's not the song that I recall you singing a few years back. Am I wrong?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>