Re: [ga] Consensus & Names Council Task Forces

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

Jeff and others,

Ok.  I will accept Jeff's' position here for the sake of moving forward.

I would like to work with anyone interested in implementing the following in the
GA.

1.    Funding.
2.    Outreach.
3.    integration of the BP.
4.    Increased effectiveness of the GA voting mechanism.

Now with the current structure of the GA where do I go to help get this done?

I think when we elect our chairs we should also elect a GA council that can
actually
get these things done by vote and consensus and the actually implement them.

Sincerely,
Eric

Jeff William's wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Jeff Williams wrote:  <major snippage>
> >
> > Let us take this line by line;
> >
> > >   This is not entirely accurate Danny.  I volunteered as did others.
> >
> > Of course you tried but when we move forward without official mandate
> > whatever the hell that is we get slammed.  And yet the GA does not give
> > mandate to anyone thereby remaining a nothingness.
>
>   Not exactly accurate here Eric.  The NC has the authority to do this.
> Yet they did not.  The ICANN CEO Stuart Lynn may also mandate
> this as well.  But again they did not do so even after being ask
> a number of times by several GA members.  In fact the ICANN
> Staff/Stuart Lynn did not even answer these requests at all.
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I and they were ignored.  One can only wonder why?
> >
> > I will tell you why big guy,  because members of the GA do not want
> > progress.
>
>   I disagree.  They want progress that is meaningful, and responsible
> to the GA members.  The ICANN BOD and staff do not want this.
> Hence the GA is being left to shrivel up and die.  Yet YOU seem to
> still be here.  Why is that if you believe what you are saying here?
>
> >
> >
> > > However your point is still well taken here in that a large number of GA
> > > members seem more interested in promoting themselves, back
> > > biting others, or slurring others rather than getting some work done.
> >
> > Funny you and Chuck both like to tone it down to untruth.  This is not
> > benign but a nasty malignant cancer.
>
>   Oh Name calling now are we?  How productive, eh?  :(  Not only is
> this a mischaracterization it is a demonstration of not practicing what
> you claim you believe in.  Why is that Eric?
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > However I have still not heard or seen anywhere what happened
> > > to Roelands Motion passed here by the GA members?  Can you
> > > tell us what happened to that in MdR?  I suspect it was not even
> > > presented...
> >
> > Good luck but I heard him present it!
>
>   So why is it not documented anywhere?  Now I did here allot
> regarding Danny's errant ICANNWORLD.ORG!!  >;)  Kinda
> interesting how that worked out isn't it?  Seems that Danny is now
> vying for an ICANN staff position and you are seeking an
> ICANN BoD seat.  >;)  Nice try again Eric, no cigar!
>
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > ERic
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html