DNSO Archives: [ga-full]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC BS

To: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>, "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Subject: Re: [ga] NC BS
From: "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 11:06:24 -0400
Cc: "GA List" <ga@dnso.org>
References: <20020516103822.GB26485@yoda.does-not-exist.org> <01da01c1fcdb$f6245c60$6501a8c0@aim.be> <20020516142248.GL26485@yoda.does-not-exist.org>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

Philip, to suggest that there are stakeholders is to suggest that some
people are not statekholders.  What would be the basis for saying someone
isn't a stakeholder?  Who exactly do you want to exclude?  If you don't want
to exclude anyone, what are we talking about?

--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- [ga] NC BS
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>

References:
- [ga] NC BS
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- Re: [ga] NC BS
  - From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>