Re: [ga] an ISC

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.com>]

Friday, May 17, 2002, 10:15:25 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:

>>  An ISC would need an idependent and anonymous voting system, not
>>a clone of the GA system. 

> What, precisely, is wrong with the current GA system?

>>It would also need independent scrutineers.

> What, precisely, is wrong with having "vote observers" which are  
> reasonably independent wh4en taken as a group?  This is one example  
> where biases in all directions can actually cancel out.

And:

>>...which will guarantee a potential to hold them hostage in an
>>IDNO style paralysis, especially when mailing lists are the sole 
>>means of self-organizing and charter-writing. (GA clone)

> As opposed to web forums, where the _only_ archive available is  
> under central control?

Surely you know by now Thomas that Joop means that only HIS voting
booth, where he holds the keys, and a web forum under HIS control,
where he holds the keys, is the ONLY WAY things can possibly be
considered the right way to do things.

After all, he IS Joop.


-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html