Re: [ga-rules] Discussing the Meaning of "Consensus"

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all,

  I agree with you last sentance/comment/request that all sub-lists should be
bounced to the DNSO GA-Full list.

  I think that as we have already had a number of motions proposed and
two have been voted upon already, that with respect to the now
pending motion regarding the .BIZ registry situation and that this issue
has been more than adequately vetted on the ga-rules sub list, that
this motion should be either denied officially or that the Chair should
request a ballot to be prepared for the voting members to vote
their positions on this issue.  Other issues, that are also under
discussion on the sub-lists and the GA list itself at times, are
also nearing the time for a vote to be taken.

Eric Dierker wrote:

> Mr. Corliss is correct on this.  Unless and until we agree to change the list
> rules, we should try to use the lists as superheaders.  I now like to think of
> the GA list as one to go to when you get closer to an issue being ready for a
> motion. However we should be careful to be inclusive and reply to a sender if we
> think they are outside of the sublist.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out to me.
> Eric
>
> (i also still want the sub-lists resolve also to the ga-full, please ;-})
>
> "William X. Walsh" wrote:
>
> > Here we go again.
> >
> > Monday, June 25, 2001, 7:32:46 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:33:34 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:
> >
> > >> We must do both; argue and delve and debate and question and postulate and
> > >> formulate:  But then we must also conglomerate and educate and reformulate
> > >> and provide proof and *DIRECT* policy.
> >
> > > Hi Eric
> >
> > > The consensus seems to be that "consensus" should be discussed on
> > > {ga-rules].  One or two don't agree.  The others don't care very much.
> >
> > > As Acting Chair, my determination is that [ga-rules] is the appropriate
> > > venue to discuss "meta" issues relating to rules, procedures, protocols
> > > and how to reach consensus.
> >
> > > Wouldn't you agree?
> >
> > > Best regards
> > > Patrick Corliss
> >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> > Userfriendly.com Domains
> > The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> > DNS Services from $1.65/mo
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html