RE: [ga] NC members, censorship and other absurd things

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

That still won't work without strict authentication. The aliased mail is
ample proof of that. What if a message,purportedly from you, were to be
published, by someone else, stating things that were completely at odds with
your views.

In matters of import, we must know who said what, or suffer the same fate as
the constructors of the tower of Babel.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Bret A.
> Fausett
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 1999 9:57 AM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] NC members, censorship and other absurd things
>
>
> Amadeu Abril i Abril wrote:
> > Please try to read the GA archives. The real fear is not that this
> > list gets censored. It is that it gets completly ignored.
>
> An important point. At a time when some of us are trying to
> convince other
> participants to use the Internet as a vehicle for real work
> and to keep
> costs downs, we get a first class example from Mr. Baptista of why
> conference calls and face-to-face meetings are still
> preferable to most
> people.
>
> We won't be able to use this medium effectively until we have created
> effective policies and procedures for keeping the dialogue
> constructive.
> Roberto posted the ORSC civil discourse rules. Any other
> models out there
> would be appreciated.
>
>       -- Bret
>
>