RE: Draft New Draft

[Teddy A Purwadi <sekjen@apjii.or.id>]

At 12:07 AM 2/9/99 -0500, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
>Kent Crispin wrote
>>
>> Antony, ccTLDs are monopolies, just like NSI, and monopolies will not
>> persist unregulated.  They will therefore be regulated by their
>> associated sovereignty, or by ICANN.  One way or another they will be
>> regulated.
>>
>
>Well, if you say so, it must be true.
>
>By the way, what is the "associated sovereignty" of East Timor?  Taiwan?
>Guam?  Puerto Rico? Aruba?  Hong Kong?  The West Bank and Gaza?  Western
>Sahara?

It was at slashdot.org discussions. Yes, I think we should ask to ISO-3166
Maintenance Agency, what kind of their authority to put these *flame* name
into standard name and country code into the international list.
Who responsible?. Its take a multiflier effect into multizones, WIPO, ITA,
POSTAL, IANA, IETF, UNCTAD, etc. How can we judge ourself into 
flame-policy of domain name, is because wrong from the beginning? 
How standardized they are?
May be the simple solution is just to rid-off these *flame-name* from
the List. As simple as that?
Now the ball is back to the ISO-3166 Maintenance Agency, how powerfull
to make an global effect.

Thanks,

>
>Antony

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia [APJII]
Indonesian Internet Service Provider Association
Grha Citra Caraka [GCC], TELKOM Bldg, Mezzanine Fl.
Jln Jend Gatot Subroto 52, Jakarta 12710 - INDONESIA
NOC-1: GCC
NOC-2: R23, 1st Fl, INDOSAT Bldg.
             Jln Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 21, Jakarta 10110
I: http://www.apjii.or.id
V:+62-21 526 8777
F:+62-21 526 8789
E: sekjen@apjii.or.id