ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[wg-review] [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted


As per your request, Chris, this was the last post in that thread. Thanks 
to Rod Dixon for his work in compiling this.

>Structural and/or Procedural Problem areas within the DNSO that impede its
>mission of becoming a bottom-up policy coordination body:


>1. Unrepresented constituents.
>2. Unrepresentative constituencies.
>3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
>positions.
>  4. The process is not producing adequate documents for the board.
>5. No agreed definition for "domain name"
>6. No agreed definition for "end user" and "real end user"
>7. Poor clarification of issues that ICANN has charter to address that
>directly affect "end users".
>8. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
>positions.
>9.  Arguable the weighting of constituencies (currently all are equal) on
>Names Council is inappropriate?  How can one decide what is appropriate and
>who decides?
>10. GA feel marginalized and powerless.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>