[wg-review] Re: [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted

["Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Thank you Greg. So am I to understand that by the use of different headers
we are to discuss all of these topics at the same time rather than just go
down the list?

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic


----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Burton" <sidna@feedwriter.com>
To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
Cc: <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 4:25 PM
Subject: [Agenda] Issues List as it was last posted


> As per your request, Chris, this was the last post in that thread. Thanks
> to Rod Dixon for his work in compiling this.
>
> >Structural and/or Procedural Problem areas within the DNSO that impede
its
> >mission of becoming a bottom-up policy coordination body:
>
>
> >1. Unrepresented constituents.
> >2. Unrepresentative constituencies.
> >3. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
> >positions.
> >  4. The process is not producing adequate documents for the board.
> >5. No agreed definition for "domain name"
> >6. No agreed definition for "end user" and "real end user"
> >7. Poor clarification of issues that ICANN has charter to address that
> >directly affect "end users".
> >8. Process does not encourage compromise among parties  with competing
> >positions.
> >9.  Arguable the weighting of constituencies (currently all are equal) on
> >Names Council is inappropriate?  How can one decide what is appropriate
and
> >who decides?
> >10. GA feel marginalized and powerless.
>

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html