<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
Personally I think you've done great. Sorry if I'm confused. But this
question does seem relevant since people are debating that issue. You did
ask for people to add questions, right?
Chris McElroy aka NameCritic
----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "Chris McElroy" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: <WG-review@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] The Number 1 Problem
> Hello Chris,
>
> > How about this one.
> >
> > Would you rather have a one-person one-vote system, with reports on the
> > minority position/s as well as the majority, rather than one of the
> various
> > consensus methods that have been described so far?
> >
>
> Consensus { }
> One-person one-vote { }
>
> Hope this group can reach its own direction.
>
> My role here is a coordinator who is supposed to help you to proceed
> the process as liaison from NC with my limited English ability which
> seems to have brought some misunderstanding in this list.
>
> If that caused you to be confused, I apologize for that.
>
> Thanks,
> YJ
>
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|