Re: [wg-review] [process] Bounced Messages and language issues

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 10:53 AM 1/18/01, Pilar Luque wrote:

>What is the exact limit date for completing the DNSO Review report?

Strictly speaking, we're past it for this working group. My understanding 
of the WG's intent is to finalize everything by March 4. We need this 
summary as soon as possible so that we can consider it, form policy and 
procedure recommendations, adopt them, and include them in the report.

In response to the urgency indicated in the volume of mail we've seen, I've 
offered to move the issue up to be discussed next week, rather than 
sometime in mid-February. So, the sooner the better for the summary. 
Perhaps someone else could volunteer to help with that?

> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:12:06PM +0000, Pilar Luque wrote:
> > > Dear Greg,
> > >
> > > I cannot promise anything because of my actual work burden, but I will
> > > try my best.
> >

>Kent Crispin wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, we can't accept that excuse -- that is precisely the one that
> > ICANN uses.

At 10:53 AM 1/18/01, Pilar Luque wrote:
>I said I would try my best as I am very interested in getting this
>motion forward. Try to be a bit more understanding.  I am actually
>working on the translation of a lenthy document into English!!!   I even
>initiated this discussion.

I'm not speaking for Kent, but I believe he was trying to indicate that 
there can be understandable delays in the process due to other 
circumstances. That is as true for ICANN as a whole as it is for an 
individual, and it should be recognized by all parties involved.

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html