Re: [wg-review] reporting

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 11:58 AM 1/31/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>1/31/01 10:16:56 AM, Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM> wrote:
>
> >I do not want to suggest any impropriety on behalf of Ms. Swineheart for
> >actions taken before, or her current intentions. But I do want to
> >comment that her most recent post to this WG was a prompt response,
> >clear and unambiguous.

It was indeed.

>This WG must disassociate itself from Ms Swineheart's "reports" and if 
>need be, from
>Ms. Swineheart herself.  Her agenda is clear.  Please read Greg Burton's 
>painfully
>reconstructed Backround of the DNSO review Process.  If that doesn't make 
>things
>patently clear... I am afraid nothing will.

If you're reading that timeline as an indictment of ANYONE, particularly 
Ms. Swinehart, you are reading more into it than I intended. I believe the 
timeline shows that the NC made several mistakes, but the point of the 
exercise was to show where the mistakes are, NOT to ascribe any agenda or 
cast blame on anyone.

Hopefully, that's clear.


Less heat and more light,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html