[wg-review] Re: DNDEF, GA, & NC

["Babybows.com" <webmaster@babybows.com>]

Eric Dierker writes:  "it is completely illogical to proclaim the assembly
to be an activity".  I am willing to concede that perhaps Eric is right, but
a "body" whose only defined function is to "nominate" is not much of a
"body".  Further, a "body" that cannot even designate its own Chair has too
little authority.  I value the collective wisdom of the GA.  I believe it
deserves greater authority than it currently enjoys, and I believe that the
GA may be the best tool to properly represent the interests of the Public in
the DNSO.   To that end, I wish to see it represented on the Names Council.
Please pardon my semantic lapse.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html