Re: [ga] icannworld.org

[Eric Dierker <eric@HI-TEK.COM>]

I was quite pleased to meet and speak with Mr. Thorton after his presentation
and Q&A period.  The guy uses a little too much dramatic pause but otherwise the
presentation according to agenda that I witnessed was very good.

Boyo boyo this stuff sounds like a jealous spouse.

Let us center on substantive issues rather than personal grievances with gross
history and procedural tit for tat.

Sincerely,
Eric

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> Hi Joop
>
> > While I am very disappointed about what happended yesterday at the GA
> > meeting, with the published agenda suddenly disregarded  and 2 items not
> > addressed,  I will not help playing the game of attacking a Chair before
> > there is another elected one willing to take over that thankless job.
>
> Sorry, Joop, the TLDA members have raised as an issue that Bradley
> Thornton's presentation was cut out from the agenda without notice.  If
> true, I would argue
> that is iniquitous.  I have no knowledge of the reason for it being cut.
>
> You should be aware that Danny lost my support some time ago.
>
> As far as Danny following proper process I would also remind you of the
> following:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
> To: Danny Younger <webmaster@babybows.com>
> Cc: [ga] <ga@dnso.org>; <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 6:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Motion Accepted
>
> Hi Danny
>
> Perhaps I should have read your wishy washy, doublespeak wording more
> carefully.  You wrote:
>
> > > At some point our Secretariat will advise when it is ready to once more
> > > support the activities of the General Assembly.  Perhaps we might be
> > > able to conclude a vote on this motion by early October (according to
> > > the most recent timetable put forth).  In the meantime, you may wish to
> > > get a "sense of the GA" on this topic through a poll.
>
> The fact is that the DNSO Secretariat never had any intention of putting my
> motion to a vote.  I doubt if you did either despite your misleading heading
> "Motion Accepted".
>
> If we can't even get an internal motion to a vote of the GA, what chance do
> we have with something that has external implicatations.
>
> So can we cut the crap and just write off the GA as a farce?
>
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Corliss <patrick@quad.net.au>
> To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> Cc: [ga] <ga@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Motion Accepted
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:33:50 EDT, Danny Younger wrote:
> >
> > > I have no objection to accepting the motion that you have proposed.
> > > At some point our Secretariat will advise when it is ready to once more
> > > support the activities of the General Assembly.  Perhaps we might be
> > > able to conclude a vote on this motion by early October (according to
> > > the most recent timetable put forth).  In the meantime, you may wish to
> > > get a "sense of the GA" on this topic through a poll.
> >
> > Thank you for your support and your comments.  By my count, there are
> > 18 declared supporters for the present proposal:
> >
> > *    Peter de Blanc
> > *    Roeland Meyer
> > *    Leah Gallegos
> > *    Jefsey Morfin
> > *    Ken Stubbs
> > *    William S. Lovell
> > *    Marilyn Cade
> > *    Ross Wm. Rader (for Tucows)
> > *    Bradley Thornton
> > *    Alexander Svensson
> > *    Michael McNulty
> > *    Joop Teernstra
> > *    Erica Roberts
> > *    Marc Schneiders
> > *    Vany Martinez
> > *    John C. Lewis
> > *    Derek Conant (with reservations)
> > *    Patrick Corliss (myself)
> >
> > I believe that we have sufficient mandate to request members to use the
> > [ga-rules] mailing list to debate procedural or other administrative
> > issues like websites, mailing lists, etc.
> >
> > > To facilitate that effort, and in response to the recommendation put
> forth
> > > by Bill Lovell to create our own website, I have begun building such a
> > > site (with an area devoted to current motions).  You may visit
> > > http://www.icannworld.org to see the results of my efforts over the
> > > course of this weekend.
> >
> > I would, of course, thank both Bill Lovell and yourself, as well as Joanna
> > Lane, for your kind efforts.
> >
> > One wonders why we cannot incorporate these initiatives into the current
> > DNSO website.  I see this as an issue that needs to be discussed on the
> > [ga-rules] mailing list.
> >
> > > Clicking on the General Assembly Link will take you to the page that
> > > leads you to the Straw Poll.
> >
> > Thank you.  At least we start with the 18 names above (19 if we include
> > yourself) in favour of discussing non-substantive issues on the [ga-rules]
> > mailing list.
> >
> > I see that as sufficient mandate to encourage compliance with this motion.
> >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Danny
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Patrick Corliss
>
> <snip footers>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html