<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] DNSO Constituency Structure
Patrick and all assembly members,
I think to follow along with you idea here that it would be better
to merge the ASO and the DNSO rather than the PSO and the
ASO as the DNSO and the ASO are more closely aligned
from a function standpoint.
Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 15:55:00 -0500, Sandy Harris wrote:
>
> > There is, as far as I can see, no reason to imagine that something
> > that achieves a majority in the GA has broad support among users
> > or any other relevant group.
>
> Exactly. Whilst I take Joanna's point about process, I am sure that the
> structure influences the process. It's a bit like the British adversarial
> system of law where the system of pitting of one party against another
> inevitably influences the legal processes of challenge and cross
> examination.
>
> Which is why I proposed that the Address Supporting Organisation (ASO) and
> the Protocol Supporting Organisation (PSO) be merged together. That would
> lift the status of the DNSO from a third to a half share of the power
> structure.
>
> I note that nobody has argued against that course of action !!
>
> Anyone?
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|