ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] NC BS


----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@wxsoft.info>
: >     If that is the rule, and "there is no logic involved," should the
rule
: > be changed?    The GA list generates dozens of messages on some days,
and
: > this is really too much for many people.   It isn't as if they are
somehow
: > less qualified, they maybe have other demands on thier time and
bandwidth
: > than following *all* of the traffic.   Which is why some people I know
use
: > the archives to keep up, when something interesting is actually
happening.
:
: Being a part of a group such as this is not just a privilege, it is a
: responsibility.
:
: It isn't about "qualified" or not.  If they cannot remain members of
: the list, then they are not members of the assembly.
:
: It is easy enough in just about every modern email client for average
: users to filter emails from lists such as this one into their own
: folder.  Then they can select which ones to read, if any, when they
: come in each day.  The barrier to being a voting member is a small
: one, and I don't feel it is reasonable to say that it is too high a
: barrier.  It is a quite simple and quite small commitment to make.

    But this is not a requirement for those who belong to "official" DNSO
constituencies?


   Jamie
--------------------------------
James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>