DNSO Discuss Mail Archive

• Raúl Echeberría, raul@inia.org.uy
• Re: ISOC -Reply, Feb 09, 1999
• Re: ISOC -Reply -Reply, Feb 09, 1999
• Re: ISOC -Reply -Reply -Reply, Feb 10, 1999
• Re: Who in ISOC supports the DNSO.ORG Draft? (was Re: Whos is on that draft), Feb 10, 1999
• Clarifying some points--END, Feb 11, 1999
• A Gehring, alg@open.org
• Re: the Individual Domain Name Owners constituency, Apr 12, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] Re: [IDNO:87] Re: the non-commercial constituency, Jun 02, 1999
• A.M.Rutkowski, amr@chaos.com
• Re: A few answers on ISO-3166..., Feb 24, 1999
• Alex Kamantauskas, alexk@tugger.net
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Users need to be able to speak for themselves(Was: Re:Position of SOs), Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Users need to be able to speak for themselves(Was: Re:Position of SOs), Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Users need to be able to speak for themselves(Was: Re:Position of SOs), Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: How not to define membership classes, Jan 06, 1999
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Physical locations and meeting proximity., Jan 06, 1999
• Re: My app declined, Jan 06, 1999
• Re: Practical info - Washington meeting, Jan 12, 1999
• Re: Please end this nonsens., Jan 13, 1999
• Re: Useful Comments Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 08, 1999
• Re: list Re: FW: Network Solutions' TLD Zone File Access Program, Feb 11, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] The Jeff Williams Report, Feb 12, 1999
• Re: Proof! (fwd) [Advisory Notice from IHOJ] Subject: UnsavoryIndividules "NetKooks", Apr 15, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] I made it! [Was: RE: Proof! (fwd) [Advisory Notice fromIHOJ] Subject:Unsavory Individules "NetKooks"], Apr 15, 1999
• Amadeu Abril i Abril, Amadeu@nominalia.com
• Welcome, and Some pointers, Oct 26, 1998
• Re: Monterrey, Mexico meeting, Oct 27, 1998
• Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?, Dec 10, 1998
• New application draft on the web, Dec 16, 1998
• (Nearly) everything is feasible (was: somehting else.....), Dec 22, 1998
• Incorporating DNSO?, Dec 22, 1998
• Re: time, Dec 22, 1998
• Re: (Nearly) everything is feasible (was: somehting else.....), Dec 23, 1998
• Re: time, Dec 28, 1998
• DNSO APPLICATION TIMETABLE, Jan 02, 1999
• Re: DNSO APPLICATION TIMETABLE, Jan 03, 1999
• Re: DNSO APPLICATION TIMETABLE, Jan 03, 1999
• Re: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 10, 1999
• Re: DNSO.ORG's deciion making process, Jan 10, 1999
• Re: Amadeu's back, Jan 10, 1999
• Re: DNSO worries, Jan 10, 1999
• Re: DNSO worries, Jan 11, 1999
• Comments received, being published, Jan 11, 1999
• Wash DC Meeting Invitation Letter on the website, Jan 11, 1999
• Washington DC Meeting & DNSO Process, Jan 12, 1999
• WASH DC MEET - Unofficial FAQ, Jan 12, 1999
• Test, please ignore, Jan 12, 1999
• Re: Washington DC Meeting & DNSO Process, Jan 13, 1999
• DNSO website updates, Jan 16, 1999
• Re: DNSO website updates, Jan 17, 1999
• Quebec to Join EU? [Was: Re: DNSO.ORG transition team], Jan 17, 1999
• DNSO website updated (more comments), Jan 18, 1999
• DNSO Important update: The "Merged" Draft, Jan 19, 1999
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: merge5.txt, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: Merge draft, Jan 20, 1999
• DNSO website update: New Draft & More, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: Merge draft, Jan 20, 1999
• IMÑORTANT: Teleconf on Saturday 23, Jan 20, 1999
• a short aside on Walsh's attacks, Jan 25, 1999
• Draftsd, drafts, drafts....., Jan 27, 1999
• Draft/No Draft, Jan 27, 1999
• Re: Onward, Jan 28, 1999
• Re: Onward, Jan 29, 1999
• Re: minimizing conflict, Jan 30, 1999
• [Fwd: Proposal to ICANN], Feb 05, 1999
• Whos is on that draft, Feb 05, 1999
• Paris draft?, Feb 05, 1999
• Test, please ignore, Feb 05, 1999
• DNSO app in text format, Feb 05, 1999
• DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 05, 1999
• Re: DNSO app in text format, Feb 05, 1999
• Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 06, 1999
• Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 06, 1999
• Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 06, 1999
• Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 06, 1999
• [Fwd: BMW proposals for further disucssion], Feb 27, 1999
• [Fwd: DNSO Status Report and Draft Bylaws Changes], Mar 16, 1999
• Re: [Fwd: DNSO Status Report and Draft Bylaws Changes], Mar 16, 1999
• Re: A Registrar Constituency for the ICANN DNSO, Mar 16, 1999
• Re: constituency formation, Apr 03, 1999
• [Fwd: ICANN Bylaw changes posted], Apr 11, 1999
• [Fwd: List of ICANN Registrars], Apr 21, 1999
• [Fwd: ICANN Names Competitive Domain-Name Registrars], Apr 21, 1999
• [Fwd: [dnsproc-en-announce] New Release Date for Final Report], Apr 24, 1999
• [Fwd: [dnsproc-en-announce] Release of Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process], May 01, 1999
• Registrr Constituency, May 05, 1999
• Registrar Constituency meeting - Berlin, May 21, 1999
• [Fwd: ICANN Press Communiqué on Berlin Meeting Results], May 29, 1999
• Andrew Q. Kraft, MAIP, Executive Director, akraft@association.org
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Draft New Draft, Jan 30, 1999
• Paris Draft, Feb 06, 1999
• Paris Draft Site Up with Full Draft Text, Feb 06, 1999
• ICANN & DNSO, Feb 09, 1999
• Re: do we want to have constituency meetings in singapore next month?, Feb 12, 1999
• Re: do we want to have constituency meetings in singapore next month?, Feb 12, 1999
• Amendments to Paris Draft, Feb 12, 1999
• Re: preparing the singapore dnso meeting agenda now, Feb 18, 1999
• Andrew Shapiro, ashapiro@interport.net
• Aspen Institute ICANN Review Panel Proposal, Mar 02, 1999
• Antony Van Couvering, avc@interport.net
• RE: DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1, Nov 17, 1998
• RE: Fw: SO structure - private, Dec 04, 1998
• Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 08, 1999
• RE: Summary of discuss list 12/15/98 - 1/5/99 for drafting team, Jan 10, 1999
• RE: Unannounced, non-public meeting in Washington on Jan. 21?, Jan 10, 1999
• RE: DNSO worries, Jan 11, 1999
• FW: Comments recieved being published, Jan 11, 1999
• RE: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time), Jan 11, 1999
• Scraps, Jan 11, 1999
• RE: DNSO.ORG Meeting proposal on Jan.23(for the last time), Jan 11, 1999
• FW: NSI's DNSO Position, Jan 13, 1999
• RE: what ICANN is up to, Jan 14, 1999
• FW: what ICANN is up to: the financial arrangements for paying IANA salaries; why the NIST solicitation for ICANN contracts is illegal and can be stopped with an ORSC protest letter; why its a waste of board member's ti, Jan 14, 1999
• 12 Commandments of flaming, Jan 14, 1999
• Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 15, 1999
• RE: Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 15, 1999
• RE: Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 15, 1999
• RE: DNSO.ORG transition team, Jan 17, 1999
• dnso.org Transition Team Teleconf, Jan 15 99, Jan 17, 1999
• Merge draft, Jan 20, 1999
• Comments on ICC proposed changes, Jan 20, 1999
• NSI Registration Problems persist, Jan 20, 1999
• FW: IMPORTANT: Teleconf on Saturday 23, Jan 20, 1999
• RE: [Fwd: merge5.txt], Jan 20, 1999
• RE: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• RE: Merge draft, Jan 20, 1999
• RE: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Jan 21 closed meeting agenda, Jan 21, 1999
• RE: icc comments in text, Jan 21, 1999
• RE: icc comments in text, Jan 21, 1999
• RE: icc comments in text, Jan 22, 1999
• Quick Take on "closed" meeting, Jan 22, 1999
• Jan 21 "closed meeting" minutes, Part One, Jan 23, 1999
• RE: icc comments in text, Jan 25, 1999
• Jan 21 "closed" meeting minutes, Part Two, Jan 25, 1999
• RE: FW: [dnsproc-en] DNS Lotto: You Gotta Be In It To Win It, Jan 27, 1999
• FW: AIP Survey - Official Update, Jan 28, 1999
• DNS configuration stats, Jan 28, 1999
• RE: PAB [kent@songbird.com: Onward], Jan 28, 1999
• RE: sovereignty meaning attached to domain names, Jan 28, 1999
• RE: sovereignty meaning attached to domain names -Reply, Jan 28, 1999
• RE: Onward + RFC-1591, Jan 28, 1999
• RE: PAB [kent@songbird.com: Onward], Jan 28, 1999
• RE: PAB [kent@songbird.com: Onward], Jan 29, 1999
• RE: Jan 21 "closed" meeting minutes, Part Two, Jan 30, 1999
• RE: Jan 21 "closed" meeting minutes, Part Two, Jan 31, 1999
• Some recent DNSO-related meetings, Jan 31, 1999
• RE: OFF TOPIC - East Timor ccTLD servers attacked, Jan 31, 1999
• RE: OFF TOPIC - East Timor ccTLD servers attacked, Jan 31, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Jan 31, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Jan 31, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 02, 1999
• RE: Paris Draft Site Up with Full Draft Text, Feb 08, 1999
• RE: Paris Draft Site Up with Full Draft Text, Feb 08, 1999
• RE: Paris Draft Site Up with Full Draft Text, Feb 08, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Question for Esther: What is the Role of the GAC? (Government Advisory Committee), Feb 09, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: ISOC -Reply -Reply -Reply, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: ISOC -Reply -Reply -Reply, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 10, 1999
• RE: ISOC -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply, Feb 11, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 11, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 11, 1999
• RE: Yes, we can reach an agreement. Let's meet in Singapore., Feb 11, 1999
• RE: RFC 1591 and ccTLD's (was Draft new draft), Feb 11, 1999
• When the NC must act - a target to shoot at, Feb 13, 1999
• RE: [IFWP] RE: Trademarks vs DNS, Feb 16, 1999
• RE: preparing the singapore dnso meeting agenda now, Feb 18, 1999
• RE: [IFWP] Re: Singapore DNSO Meeting Schedule and Agenda - 2nd draft, Feb 26, 1999
• Antoun Nabhan, anabhan@law.harvard.edu
• Re: ICANN language translation, Mar 27, 1999
• Re: ICANN Berlin meeting Remote Simultaneous Translation Project, Mar 28, 1999
• Re: ICANN language translation, Mar 28, 1999
• Becky Burr, bburr@ntia.doc.gov
• Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?, Jan 13, 1999
• Bernard Turcotte, turcotte@canarie.ca
• RE: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?, Dec 11, 1998
• RE: PAB [kent@songbird.com: Onward], Jan 29, 1999
• RE: And now?, Feb 06, 1999
• Bob Allisat, bob@fcn.net
• Re: [ifwp] Re: The IANA's File of iTLD Requests (Flashback), Nov 16, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List, Dec 18, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: IS it time for a new DNSO?, Dec 18, 1998
• Re: FW: [dnsproc-en] DNS Lotto: You Gotta Be In It To Win It, Jan 26, 1999
• Re: FW: [dnsproc-en] DNS Lotto: You Gotta Be In It To Win It, Jan 26, 1999
• DISBAND ICANN: ON TO THE WRAP-UP !!, Jan 27, 1999
• .CA Monopoly... .CDN anyone?, Jan 29, 1999
• http://www.dyson.com, Feb 18, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] RE: JW fools another reporter! Wired quotes a fraud!, Mar 04, 1999
• Bob Helfant, bhelfant@inamecorp.com
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 03, 1998
• RE: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 08, 1998
• Re: Jan 21 "closed" meeting minutes, Part Two, Jan 27, 1999
• Bret A. Fausett, baf@fausett.com
• DNSO / Fluid Constituencies, Nov 24, 1998
• DNSO / Individual v. Corporate Voting, Nov 24, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: DNSO documents, Dec 18, 1998
• Re: (Nearly) everything is feasible, Dec 23, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Constituencies, Jan 13, 1999
• AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 19, 1999
• Re: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• AIP Bylaws Draft, Jan 20, 1999
• RE: AIP DNSO Proposal, Jan 20, 1999
• Re: Impressions from Washington, Jan 26, 1999
• Re: Draft New Draft, Feb 01, 1999
• Re: DNSO process and Drafts submitted to ICANN, Feb 06, 1999
• Re: Chopped liver no more! Was Re: do we want......?, Feb 16, 1999
• Bret Fausett, baf@fausett.com
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Monterrey Report, Nov 26, 1998
• Re: How do we want DNSO to be?, Nov 27, 1998
• Re: DNSO / Fluid Constituencies, Nov 30, 1998
• Re: DNSO / Fluid Constituencies, Nov 30, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: DNSO documents, Dec 17, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: DNSO documents, Dec 20, 1998
• Re: Who in ISOC supports the DNSO.ORG Draft? (was Re: Whos is on that draft), Feb 11, 1999
• Brett Glass, brett@lariat.org
• Re: grandfathering of .us domains?, May 17, 1999
• Re: grandfathering of .us domains?, May 17, 1999
• Interesting article on ICANN, May 17, 1999
• Re: grandfathering of .us domains?, May 18, 1999
• Re: John Horvath's article on ICANN, May 18, 1999
• Bruce Robertson, bruce@greatbasin.net
• Useless list, Jan 27, 1999
• Cade,Marilyn S - LGA, mcade@att.com
• RE: [dnso.discuss] Re: do we want to have constituency meetings in singapore next month?, Feb 14, 1999
• Carsten Schiefner, carsten.schiefner@tcpip-gmbh.de
• Re: Unannounced, non-public meeting in Washington on Jan. 21?, Jan 09, 1999
• cgomes, cgomes@internic.net
• RE: DNSO / ICANN Funding Model Paper, Version 0.1, Nov 16, 1998
• RE: Some ideas about COMMON VALUES -- Re: Proposed DNSO bylaws, Jan 04, 1999
• NSI's DNSO Position, Jan 13, 1999
• RE: Domain name glitch hits 10,000 names, Jan 27, 1999
• RE: Draft New Draft, Feb 10, 1999
• Christopher Ambler, cambler@iodesign.com
• Re: [ifwp] Attention ICANN/Christopner Ambler: Sun wins injunction againstSun wins injunction against, Nov 18, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: New York Times article on ccTLDs/IATLD, Nov 28, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: New York Times article on ccTLDs/IATLD, Nov 28, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 02, 1998
• Re: Death of a Registry, Dec 03, 1998
• Re: Death of a Registry, Dec 03, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 03, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Second response to:Re: Users need to be able to speak for themselves(Was: Re:Position of SOs), Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List, Dec 18, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: Addition of Joe Sims to Participants Mailing List, Dec 18, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: DNSO documents, Dec 21, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: time, Dec 28, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: time, Dec 29, 1998
• Attendance at the 22 January meeting, Jan 06, 1999
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Ripple, Jan 10, 1999
• Re: Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 15, 1999
• Re: Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 15, 1999
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Commentary on ICC submission, Jan 18, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] I made it! [Was: RE: Proof! (fwd) [Advisory Notice from IHOJ] Subject:Unsavory Individules "NetKooks"], Apr 15, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] Re: Registrar Constituency meeting - Berlin, May 22, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] Re: voting, May 22, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] Re: Registrar Constituency meeting - Berlin, May 23, 1999
• Christopher.WILKINSON, Christopher.WILKINSON@bxl.dg13.cec.be
• ICANN - public sector user stakeholders., Jan 19, 1999
• John Horvath's article on ICANN, May 18, 1999
• Clare Wardle, Clare.Wardle@postoffice.co.uk
• Re: ISOC support of DNSO.ORG Washington DC draft., Feb 09, 1999
• Re: ISOC support of DNSO.ORG Washington DC draft., Feb 09, 1999
• Cliff Dilloway, cliffd@endispute.co.uk
• Re: Our draft, Dec 17, 1998
• Colin Gan, colin@ddns.org
• Unity is Strength, Jan 11, 1999
• Collignon, Collignon@netbay.net
• Re: "constitutional protections", Nov 13, 1998
• Craig Simon, cls@flywheel.com
• [ifwp] RE: Some ideas about COMMON VALUES -- Re: Proposed DNSO bylaws, Jan 04, 1999
• Re: DNSO website updates, Jan 17, 1999
• Dan Steinberg, dstein@travel-net.com
• Re: [ifwp] Re: What is this? Why are we surprised with it?, Jan 12, 1999
• Re: The People's Republic of ICANN?, Feb 06, 1999
• Dave Crocker, dcrocker@brandenburg.com
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 05, 1998
• Re: [iana@ISI.EDU: SO note], Dec 23, 1998
• Re: News from the ORSC, Dec 23, 1998
• Re: Our draft, Dec 25, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: time, Dec 29, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] RE: time, Dec 29, 1998
• Re: Physical locations and meeting proximity., Jan 06, 1999
• RE: icc comments in text, Jan 19, 1999
• Re: icc comments in text, Jan 19, 1999
• Re: icc comments in text, Jan 24, 1999
• Re: Onward, Jan 28, 1999
• RE: JW fools another reporter! Wired quotes a fraud!, Mar 04, 1999
• Re: [IFWP] Jeff Speaks Part Two, Mar 04, 1999
• David Schutt, david@speco.com
• Quality Control, Dec 10, 1998
• INTA Application, Dec 18, 1998
• DNSO Dilemma, Dec 22, 1998
• RE: Incorporating DNSO?, Dec 24, 1998
• RE: Incorporation or not?, Jan 08, 1999
• David W. Maher, dwmaher@ibm.net
• RE: Monterrey, Mexico meeting, Oct 29, 1998
• Re: Proposal for a new ORSC/DNSO project, Dec 03, 1998
• Re: Fw: SO structure - private, Dec 04, 1998
• Re: [ifwp] Re: Why was Draft 7 of the application not posted to the discuss list?, Dec 11, 1998
• Re: Our draft, Dec 20, 1998
• Re: Our draft, Dec 23, 1998
• Re: [iana@ISI.EDU: SO note], Dec 25, 1998