Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [comments-wgb] Feedback, Working Group B
  • From: "Jim Fellers" <jf55115@wt.net>
• [comments-wgb] TM and a Domain Name (Are they the same?)
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• [comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• No Subject
  • From: Mihm Michael W <MihmMichaelW@JDCORP.deere.com>
• [comments-wgb] Trademark Owners Rights/Cyber Squatters
  • From: "SS Steve Scharf (1368)" <Steve.Scharf@amgreetings.com>
• [comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20
  • From: "J. Scott Evans" <jse@adamspat.com>
• [comments-wgb] ServiceMaster Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
  • From: Douglas_W._Colber@svm.com
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus Twenty proposal
  • From: "Ron Greigg" <rgreigg@ix.netcom.com>
• [comments-wgb] (no subject)
  • From: Jose Gomez-Marquez <jose@home.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: "Serge Hadji" <Serge.Hadji@trw.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: "Sandi L Colello" <Sandi.L.Colello@trw.com>
• [comments-wgb] Domain names
  • From: "Lies, Otto R." <Otto.R.Lies@sgcna.com>
• [comments-wgb] Response to Sunrise Proposal
  • From: "Juan Roberto Gonzalez" <jgonzalez@swlaw.edu>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
  • From: Brinton Scott <BScott@dentonwildesapte.com.cn>
• [comments-wgb] Protecting Globally Famous Trademarks (2)
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• [comments-wgb] Objection to "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal
  • From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>
• [comments-wgb] Definition of "Famous" and Expansion of Mark Holders' Rights Should Be Carefully Limited
  • From: Robert Szarka <szarka@downcity.net>
• [comments-wgb] *Sunrise Plus Twenty*
  • From: "Palmer, Lynne" <Lynne.Palmer@ecolab.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: druckmr@nytimes.com
• [comments-wgb] ICANN - Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
  • From: "Jeanne E Oneill" <jonei2@jcpenney.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: Steve Price <srprice@pacbell.net>
• [comments-wgb] Comments to Sunrise+20 Proposal
  • From: "Gundelfinger, Anne" <anne.gundelfinger@intel.com>
• [comments-wgb] AIPLA Comments to Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
  • From: "Jonathan Hudis" <JHUDIS@oblon.com>
• [comments-wgb] INTA Comments on WG-B
  • From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>
• [comments-wgb] ATTENTION: I Believe something is afoul here....Please Read...
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• [comments-wgb] Forget sunrise - dnso as trademark police?
  • From: "Ken Cowan" <kccowan@starpower.net>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty
  • From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise plus twenty
  • From: Frances Jagla <frances.jagla@abbott.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Pluse Twenty
  • From: "Shannon Gallagher" <gallaghers@PENNIE.COM>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
  • From: "Hallie, Michelena" <Michelena.Hallie@viacom.com>
• [comments-wgb] support the Sunrise
  • From: "Rose, Nick" <npr@ffwlaw.com>
• [comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise" proposal
  • From: Jeff Fisher <jeff@jeffenstein.org>
• [comments-wgb] .WEB (important)
  • From: flex@holonet.net
• [comments-wgb] I oppose "Sunrise + 20".
  • From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
• [comments-wgb] What happens to TM holders with the same name, but different class of goods or s
  • From: "greg krajewski" <udomain@mailcity.com>
• [comments-wgb] I am opposed to "Sunrise Plus Twenty"
  • From: "Blair P. Houghton" <bph@primenet.com>
• [comments-wgb] Afternic.com Members Forum Please add my name to the list
  • From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>
• [comments-wgb] .Web
  • From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
• [comments-wgb] ICANN has no mandate for the Sunrise +20 rule
  • From: "Leah G" <jandl@jandl.com>
• [comments-wgb] I oppose Sunrise + 20
  • From: David Schutt <david@speco.com>
• [comments-wgb] Fwd: .WEB (please read)
  • From: DNSO Webmaster <DNSO.Webmaster@dnso.org>
• [comments-wgb] The Realistic .Web
  • From: "hawk" <first2web@alltel.net>
• [comments-wgb] .web WILL replace the dying .com's...it's a fact...get over it..
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• [comments-wgb] position on the issues
  • From: "Judith Oppenheimer" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>
• [comments-wgb] The not so Famous Marks
  • From: Jack Landrum <jlandrum@consultant.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: rwhoke@mmm.com
• [comments-wgb] RE: New TLD's considered
  • From: Whirlwindjr@aol.com
• [comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B
  • From: "Anthony Galimberti" <Anthony@EnterpriseSolutionProviders.on.ca>
• [comments-wgb] Response to Working Group B Formal Report
  • From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
• [comments-wgb] gTLD's
  • From: "Nick Cunningham" <nick_cunningham@wragge.com>
• [comments-wgb] Intellectual Property Constituency's proposal to ICANN about trade marks and the new gTLDs
  • From: "Andrew Margiotta-mills (FCHD)" <andrew.margiotta-mills@freethcartwright.co.uk>
• [comments-wgb] "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
  • From: "Huguenin,Charles-André,VEVEY,FC-JUR/TM" <Charles-Andre.Huguenin@nestle.com>
• [comments-wgb] We support Sunrise Plus 20
  • From: KHS@de-vi.com
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Proposal Plus Twenty
  • From: "David Moyer-DM" <moyer.dm@pg.com>
• [comments-wgb] Support for "Sunrise + 20" Proposal
  • From: "M.J.P. Deans" <mjpdeans@btinternet.com>
• [comments-wgb] Trademark Protection is the responsiblity of the court system!!
  • From: "Greg Krajewski" <gkrajews@mato.com>
• [comments-wgb] Comments on "Sunrise Plus Twenty" proposal
  • From: Mark Chen <markchen@fas.harvard.edu>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision
  • From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>
• [comments-wgb] Why bother with the obsolete legacy roots anyway?
  • From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <bthornton@jointtech.com>
• [comments-wgb] Working Group B Report
  • From: Stu Benson <sbenson@farkaslaw.com>
• [comments-wgb] Support of Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: "Ettinger, Patrice" <Patrice.Ettinger@dowjones.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: "Patricia Hoet" <PHoet@hpcd-abogados.com>
• [comments-wgb] Interesting - non-commercial Constituency Position Paper
  • From: "Loh Shin Shion" <ssloh@ew.mimos.my>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20-proposal
  • From: kuntze@boehmert.de
• [comments-wgb] Comments on the WG-B (Famous and Well-known Marks) Report
  • From: azkubo@interlink.or.jp
• [comments-wgb] RE:Comments about the WG-B Report
  • From: KMPA4244@jpo-miti.go.jp
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise + 20 is good, but . . .
  • From: "Peter Gustav Olson" <pgo@ipb.dk>
• [comments-wgb] Report of Working Group B
  • From: "Anthony Galimberti" <anthony@enterprisesolutionproviders.on.ca>
• [comments-wgb] test
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>
• [comments-wgb] Support for the Sunrise Plus 20
  • From: "Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@groth.se>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty Proposal
  • From: "Michael K. Kirk" <Mkirk@aipla.org>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus twenty proposal
  • From: "Peter Broadbent" <pbroadbent@cblaw.com>
• [comments-wgb] FW: Sunrise Plus 20
  • From: "Boulware, Margaret A." <MBoulware@jenkens.com>
• [comments-wgb] Support of "Sunrise Plus Twenty" Proposal
  • From: Neal Greenfield <neal.greenfield@imagelock.com>
• [comments-wgb] MPA comments on the WGB Formal Report - support for sunrise
  • From: "Shapiro, Ted" <Ted_Shapiro@MPAA.org>
• [comments-wgb] Legality of Sunrise: A Response
  • From: Michael Heltzer <mheltzer@inta.org>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise 20 Proposal
  • From: dianne.harrington@kodak.com
• [comments-wgb] On the creation of new gTLDs
  • From: Seann Hallisky <Halliss@cojk.com>
• [comments-wgb] Time Warner Inc.'s Comments Regarding Sunrise Plus Twenty Pro posa l
  • From: "Wilson, Dennis L." <DWILSON@KMWLAW.COM>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Provision
  • From: "Candido, Domna" <candido@MajorLeagueBaseball.com>
• [comments-wgb] On the Sunrise Proposal
  • From: Craig Simon <cls@flywheel.com>
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus Twenty
  • From: "Andrew Gray" <graya@PENNIE.COM>
• [comments-wgb] Support to "very limited" sunrise period.
  • From: Raul Echeberria <raul@inia.org.uy>
• [comments-wgb] Comments to Working Group B Report
  • From: DBUSH2@aol.com
• [comments-wgb] Words First
  • From: Ellen Rony <erony@marin.k12.ca.us>
• No Subject
  • From: "DEUTSCH, SARAH B." <SARAH.B.DEUTSCH@bellatlantic.com>
• [comments-wgb] Fwd: from YJP
  • From: DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>
• [comments-wgb] Comments on Sunrise Plus Twenty proposal
  • From: "Hefte, Carrie (Legal)" <Carrie.A.Hefte@Norwest.com>
• [comments-wgb] "Sunrise + 20"
  • From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
• [comments-wgb] Novel, last-minute suggestion on how to protect trademarks
  • From: "Peter Rehm" <phr@varietygames.com>
• [comments-wgb] Tradename Vs. Domain Names P&G
  • From: DealerDashboard@aol.com
• [comments-wgb] Sunrise Plus 20 = 20 million new domains...
  • From: "Anthony Peppler" <anthony@peppler.net>
• [comments-wgb] Comments against sunrise +20
  • From: lars@Earthling.net